Thursday, December 24, 2015 Battistelli, "ready to deliver the unitary patent"

The European Patent Office (EPO) appears to have completed all rules surrounding the unitary patent. According to the EPO they formalized: implementing rules, budgetary and financial rules, the level of the renewal fees and the rules concerning the distribution of the renewal fees between the EPO and the participating member states.

Benoît Battistelli president of the EPO said, "We are now legally, technically and operationally ready to deliver the unitary patent."

In the unitary patent system the EPO will be responsible for granting unitary patents. The granting of unitary patents is a new task that comes in addition to their present task of granting European patents. A key difference between the current European patents and unitary patents is that a European patent needs to be maintained separately for each country in which patent protection is desired, but a unitary patent has a fixed list of countries in which it is valid. The EPO will also administrate the unitary patent after its grant and collect and distribute the renewal fees for the unitary patent.

That the EPO's completed its preparations is of course good news for the unitary patent, but this was not one of the legal roadblocks. There still remains the necessity of national ratifications of the unified patent court; in particular the UK's and Germany's ratification.

Photo "Another Tough Puzzle, solved" by ToddonFlickr obtained via Flickr  under a  CC-By license

Friday, November 13, 2015 Hungary signs the protocol of the Unified Patent Court Agreement

Liberty Bridge, Budapest

Hungary has signed the  'Protocol on provisional application of the Unified Patent Court Agreement'.

As we reported, on October 1, 2015 seven participating member states signed a protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court.  The protocol is significant for users of the new system since it makes it possible to have a sunrise period for opt-outs. The protocol is also significant for countries who have to implement the Agreement, since it allows some organizational and institutional aspects to be in place before the Agreement itself is in full force. Hungary was not among the signatories.

I just found out though, that about a week later, on October 7, 2015, Hungary has signed the protocol after all.

Previously, there had been indications that Hungary was getting less enthusiastic about the unitary patent, and not so long ago, a critical article appeared on Lexology, urging the Hungarian goverment to postpone adoption of the regime. Signing of this protocol seems to indicate that Hungary is nevertheless committed to go ahead with the unified patent court and unitary patent.

One of the aspects of the agreement that may be in force before the rest of the agreement, is Article 19. This article states that there will be a  Training Centre for European patent judges in Budapest. The centre already opened, but perhaps signing the protocol may be useful for this centre in some way?

The full list of signatories to the protocol at present are: Germany, Denmark, France, United Kingdom, Hungary, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Slovenia. The Netherlands have declared that they will sign the protocol as soon as it gets parliamentary approval for the unified patent court, i.e., as soon as it ratifies.

Photo "Szabadság híd" by András Farkas obtained via Flickr  under a  CC-By license

Thursday, November 12, 2015 Finland taking steps towards ratification--contours of the first 13 becoming visible?

Helsinki Cathedral

A unitary patent working group of the Finnish government has recommended that Finland's Parliament ratify the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court.

At present 8 states have fully ratified the agreement: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, and Sweden. At least 13 countries are required before the unitary patent takes effect, but ratification is expected from at least 5 more countries, e.g.: The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and Hungary. Perhaps, we may now also add Finland to the list of countries likely to ratify in the near future.  This means we are getting a better and better idea what the first list of participating member states might look like.

The Finish working group also made a proposal on amendments of the Finish patent law. Presumably, Finland will handle the ratification and amendment together, e.g., as is also being done now in the Netherlands.

The news did not include confirmation that Finland will not participate in the Nordic-Baltic regional division of the UPC. Last year, the Nordic-Baltic regional division was announced with Sweden, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. According to the Finnish patent office, Finland is considering to set up a local division of its own, which would allow local patent disputes to be litigated in Finland rather than in Stockholm (Sweden).
  

The official report is here, which includes a brief English summary. English commentary from a Finish attorney can be found here.

Photo "Tuomiokirkko HDR" by Guyon Morée obtained via Flickr  under a  CC-By license

Thursday, November 05, 2015 Reading Material for Unitary Patent: Articles, Rules and drafts

Not much case law for UPC yet

As the unified patent court and the EPO are preparing for the start of the unitary patent, the amount of rules is increasing. At the moment, I count ten documents with articles and rules that will govern the unitary patent and unified patent court. In this post I'll try to make a comprehensive list of the primary sources on the unitary patent. 

EU level regulations

At the EU level there are two regulations. These regulation dating from 2012 establish among other things the unitary effect, applicable law, and translations agreements. Below I have also included the decision from 2011 that allowed is the unitary patent to proceed without Spain and Italy. (Although Italy has joined later after all.)

Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
The document is available at Eur-lex.
Status: final

Council Regulation (EU) No 1260/2012 of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements.
The document is available at Eur-Lex.
Status: final

2011/167/EU: Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
The document is available at Eur-Lex.
Status: final

Unified Patent Court

The unified patent court is established in the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court. This agreement between EU members has been signed by most of EU member states but is not yet fully ratified. The agreement established the unified patent court (UPC) and its competency. Detailed rules for procedures at the UPC are in a semi-final draft, but cannot be established before the court has been established. A proposal for court fees is available. Recently a protocol was created for the agreement which allows some provision of the agreement to enter into force before the rest of the agreement.

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
The document is available at the website of the Council of the European Union.
Status: Ratified by 8 member states, awaits the ratification by 5 more states which must include Germany and the United Kingdom.

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of Procedure (“Rules”) of the Unified Patent Court
The document is available at the website of the unified patent court.
Status: 18th draft, Adopted by the Preparatory Committee on 19 October 2015. Must be adopted by the Administrative Committee of the UPC, which does not exist yet.

Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs
The document is available at the website of the unified patent court. 
Status: Draft (Consultation Document)

Protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court on provisional application
The document is available at the website of the unified patent court.
Status: Signed by 7 participating member states, does not enter into force until 13 States have informed the depositary that they have received parliamentary approval for the UPC

EPO

The legal basis for the unitary patent is found in the EPC (Articles 142-149a).

European Patent Convention
The document is available (pdf) at the website of the EPO.
Status: final

Draft Rules 1–24 relating to unitary patent protection
The document is available (pdf) at the documentation page at the EPO of the Select Committee
Status: Draft



Adjusted proposals for the level of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect
The document can be found here. I do not have an official link.
Status: Draft? ('adopted in principle' by the Select Committee)

Photo "Leather Bound Books" by THOR obtained via Flickr  under a  CC-By license

Friday, October 30, 2015 18th draft of UPC Rules of Procedure published

The UPC Preparatory Committee has reached a major milestone with this draft

The new 18th draft of the rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court has been published on the unified patent court website. The rules of procedure lay down the details of the proceedings before the UPC.

The 18th draft shows extensive revision of the 382 rules. Many of the changes are to improve readability and clarity of the rules, but many rules have received additional clauses and other substantive changes. A tracked changes version, comparing the current draft with the previous draft is available here.

This version of the rules of procedure should be pretty much the definitive version; the unified patent court website foreseeing changes when the court fees have been decided upon. Draft proposals for the court fees are available in draft form.

 The rules will be not be fully definitive until they are adopted by the Administrative Committee of the UPC. As the UPC has not been established, neither has its Administrative Committee. Although the recent Protocol to the UPC Agreement will establish the Administrative Committee early, even before the UPC becomes fully operative (if the protocol itself is adopted that is), Article 41 of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court which governs the adoption of the rules of procedure is not among the parts which are to start early. This implies that one of the first things the UPC will have to do once established is to adopt these rules of procedure.


Photo "Celebrating" by Patrik Nygren obtained via Flickr  under a  CC-By-sa license

Monday, October 19, 2015 Is the UPC to provide strong harmonisation in ICT applications?

According to the twitter feed of Intellectual Property Magazine, Mr. G. Philpott of EPO said at the London IP summit: 'UPC to provide strong harmonisation in ICT applications that will play a dominant role in patent world'.

I wasn't at the IP summit, and haven't heard Mr. Philpott's statement myself. I don't know what the context of the statement is. I do believe however that the unified patent court will provide some long needed harmonization, at least in the longer term.

Before grant the unitary patent system will not change, including for ICT application. A unitary European patent like the current non-unitary European patents will be granted by the EPO in the same way. Until grant, the EPO does not know if a patent will continue after grant as a unitary patent or as a nationally validated patent. The substantive rules with which EPO grants or refuses a patent are identical for unitary patent and non-unitary patents. Only after the EPO decides to grant a patent can the applicant request unitary effect.

Neither the EU regulations for the unitary patent nor the Agreement on a unified patent court contain instructions on the EPO on what to grant or refuse.

So at least up to grant the unitary patent or unified patent court will not change anything with respect to current practice. At present the EPO will grant a patent for software but only if it represents a technical innovation (as with any European patent).

All patents that are granted by the EPO after the unitary patent systems takes effect, including unitary and non-unitary patents, fall under the competence of the unified patent court. During a transitional period a non-unitary patent can be opted-out from this but a unitary patent cannot.

The unified patent court is competent for all participating member states. If the UPC finds a patent invalid, it will revoke it for all states at once. If the UPC finds a patent infringed it can enforce the patent in all states at once. This is not the case at the moment. A national European judge in one country can revoke a patent, while a judge in the next country can consider it infringed. This is not a desirable situation: even if a patent has been revoked in one country the rest of Europe does not if it is free to operate or not. Certainly for the individual patent involved, the UPC will strongly unify the decisions that are taken with respect to that patent.

The unified patent court comprises a number of local and regional divisions as well as a central division. Harmonization between these courts comes from two factors. The judges in these courts are selected from a pool of judges and contain both judges of the same state as the division as well as non-nationals. Thus judges will have to cooperate with other judges from different legal traditions. Moreover, there is a single Court of Appeal whose case law is expected to become leading. Of course, this harmonization between the courts will take time. For one thing, it will probably take a few years until the first cases have reached the Court of Appeal and are decided there.

The lack of harmonization has been complained about by judges themselves. For example, Lord
Justice Jacob had suggested Aerotel/Macrossan  to refer questions regarding the patentability of computer implemented inventions to the EPO Enlarged Board. This suggestion later led to opinion G 3/08, in which the Enlarged Board found that the EPO currently has a consistent way to examine computer implemented inventions.

No-one can say what the case law of the Court of Appeal will look like. Whether it will be dominant in the world or not is hard to say. But a case law unifying the three largest patent countries in Europe will for sure gain in importance.

Photo "Part of dead rail way thailand only" by yotananchankheaw obtained via Plixs under  Public Domain CC0 1.0 license (no changes made).

Friday, October 02, 2015 Sunrise period for opt-outs in the making

Sunrise period for unitary patent in the making

The new unified patent court will be competent for European patents with and without unitary effect. Also existing patents and patent applications are included. This means that a central revocation is possible the moment the UPC becomes into effect.

If you don't want the UPC to apply to your patent, at least for the coming years, you can file an opt-out. The problem is that the opt-out only takes effect upon its entry into the register of the unified patent court: No unified patent court, no register, no opt-outs. If thousands of opt-outs are filed on day one, it may take a while before they shows up in the register. In the meantime an action may have been brought against you.

Yesterday a new Protocol to the UPC Agreement has been signed by the first 7 participating member states, which may solve this problem. 



The protocol allows some parts of the Agreement on a Unified part court to come into effect before the Agreement itself has done so. Most of the articles that would come into effect before the full Agreement are of an institutional nature, for example: Article 1: Establishing the Unified Patent Court; Articles 15-19: Appointment of Judges; Article 36-39: Budget and Financing. As the Unified patent court should receive cases starting at the first day the Agreement comes into effect, having appointed judges before that is probably a sensible idea.

Among the articles of the Agreement that are to come into effect early is also Article 10: the Registry. Thus this protocol makes it possible to have a sunrise period for opt-outs. The unified court confirms that early registration of opt-out demands will be possible.

The  protocol was signed yesterday October 1st 2015, in the sidelines of an EU Competitiveness Council meeting. 

The Minister of the Economy and Foreign Trade of Luxembourg, Mr. E. Schneider at the signing ceremony

For those who are interested, more pictures and videos of the signing ceremony are available at the European Council website.

The protocol is not in effect yet, and in fact the requirements for the protocol to become in effect look rather similar to the requirements for the agreement itself. The Protocol enters into force the day after 13 Signatory States of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court including Germany, France and the United Kingdom, have signed the protocol and have either ratified, or informed the depositary that they have received parliamentary approval to ratify, the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court. The underlined condition is different from the condition for the Agreement.


This means that the protocol will not be effective until the full Agreement is very near indeed.The required number of states for the Agreement must have given parliamentary approval, though they need not yet have deposited the ratification. Apart from that, also the protocol needs 13 signatures ; Only 7 signatures have been collected for the protocol as of yet.

















Photo "Orange sunrise" by Wyncliffe obtained via Flickr under a CC Public Domain License (no changes made). Photo of Mr. Schneider from the European Union